Skip to content

Thought Leadership - Is America Really Dominating Energy?

Is America Really Dominating Energy - or Are We Missing Something?

You’ve probably heard the phrase “American energy dominance,” tied to headlines about rising oil and gas production. It’s true - the United States is now a net exporter of both oil and natural gas, thanks to technological advances and strategic investments. At the same time, renewable energy is booming, with solar capacity alone increasing more than 5,000% since 2010.
 
These gains have created over 250,000 solar jobs, reduced electricity costs for businesses, and catalyzed new manufacturing ventures. But while the headlines may suggest a country surging ahead, the picture isn’t entirely complete. Beneath this momentum lies a significant vulnerability: America’s aging electrical grid - much of it built in the mid-20th century.
 
This article looks beyond the headlines to examine whether energy dominance is sustainable without modern infrastructure, drawing insights from both U.K. and German approaches, and highlighting what U.S. businesses can do to take greater control of their energy future.

 



The Energy Surge: Fossil Fuels & Renewables
Let’s look at the numbers:
 
  • Oil & Gas: The U.S. flipped to a net exporter status by 2020, with natural gas exports nearly doubling since 2015due to rising production and foreign demand.
 
A graph of a graph with numbers and textDescription automatically generated with medium confidence

 
  • Solar Growth: U.S. solar capacity jumped from 15.7 GW in 2014 to 177.2 GW in 2024 - a 1,000%+ increase. The Inflation Reduction Act has catalyzed over $270 billion in clean energy investment, signaling broad, bipartisan momentum.
 
 
This reflects a dual reality: fossil fuels continue to dominate American energy output, even as renewables deliver clear economic and environmental benefits. However, both streams ultimately depend on a power grid designed for a different era.

 
Jobs, Costs, and Reliability: The Energy Debate
Energy debates often polarize around three concerns: jobscosts, and reliability.
  • Jobs: Fossil fuel industries emphasize stable, high-wage employment in drilling and refining. Renewable sectors highlight rapid job creation in manufacturing, installation, and R&D.
  • Costs: Traditional fuels may seem cheaper up front, but solar and wind offer predictable, long-term rates, particularly as hardware costs fall.
  • Reliability: Fossil fuel plants offer consistent baseload power. Renewables, supported by battery storage and grid diversification, improve resilience and reduce the risk of system-wide outages.
Both sides have valid points. But cherry-picked data too often obscures the real issue: our outdated grid is the weak link that limits the potential of all energy sources - old and new.

 
The Grid Bottleneck
Over 70% of U.S. transmission lines and large transformers are more than 25 years old, with many dating back to the 1960s and 1970s. This matters because:
  • Severe weather increasingly strains brittle infrastructure.
  • Two-way power flow - essential for solar - is difficult on old grids.
  • Upgrade costs often get passed down to customers, including businesses.
Comparing international approaches offers useful perspective:
  • The U.K., with a grid rooted in the 1930s, struggles with modern demands. One British solar expert said, “Surplus solar power often can’t get used - it goes to waste.”
  • Germany, by contrast, rebuilt much of its infrastructure post-WWII. While not without challenges, its newer grid supports greater flexibility, making it more adaptable to shifting energy technologies and patterns.
 
What This Means for Business
The U.S. leads in fossil fuel exports and renewables growth, yet risks squandering these advantages if our grid can’t keep up. For businesses, this translates into:
  • Higher energy costs from infrastructure-related fees
  • Reliability concerns from climate-related outages
  • Limited ability to participate in the energy transition
This is why on-site solar is increasingly valuable. It functions as a localized infrastructure upgrade - mitigating grid risk while locking in long-term cost predictability. Many manufacturers are already using this approach to hedge against rising rates and future-proof operations.

 
Beyond the Buzzwords
So - is America really dominating energy?
In production terms, yes. But when it comes to infrastructure and long-term resiliency, the answer is far less clear. Without a grid that can support two-way power flows, digital controls, and distributed generation, both fossil and renewable gains are at risk. As demands from data centers, electric vehicles, and AI ramp up, the real challenge lies ahead.
 
The lesson? Energy dominance isn’t just about output. It’s about having the systems in place to distribute, store, and manage that energy reliably and affordably. Countries like Germany show how newer infrastructure can enable faster adaptation. Meanwhile, U.S. companies can take matters into their own hands by investing in future-ready, on-site solutions that offer both operational and financial stability.

Scroll To Top